Skip to content

Divided over David Emerson from the Vancouver Courier

Divided over David Emerson





By Mike Howell-staff writer



If you drive past Conservative MP David Emerson's constituency office on Kingsway this Sunday, chances are Jurgen Claudepierre will be there.



The 64-year-old mason will be carrying a sign made from an old hockey stick attached to a square piece of white foam board. He's written "Why vote?" on it.



When Claudepierre is not pacing in front of Emerson's office, he'll be escaping the cold weather inside his Chevy pickup. That would be the one with the large sign mounted in the box of the truck.



On one side he's written, "David Emerson resign." The other side, which faces Emerson's office, asks, "Is that democracy?" A garbage can placed on the tailgate with another sign stuffed in it says, "Vancouver-Kingsway ballot box."



"I thought we were going to clean up government," said Claudepierre over car honks of support in front of Emerson's office last week. "I'm here because I have passion in my life. I'm committed to this. I'm planning on being here every Sunday until something happens, until he resigns."



Like 20,061 other voters in the Vancouver- Kingsway riding, Claudepierre voted for Emerson the Liberal. Another 15,470 voted for Ian Waddell of the NDP and 8,679 cast a ballot for Conservative candidate Kanman Wong.



As the results showed-as they have over the decades-the predominately working class riding votes Liberal or NDP. Conservatives aren't welcome there.



So when Emerson crossed the floor Feb. 6 to the Conservatives and accepted the portfolio of international trade minister, the wave of anger that rolled through the riding was not surprising.



That Emerson never told former prime minister Paul Martin or his once-fellow Vancouver Liberal MPs about his decision further infuriated Liberal party members and voters.



It's now the news story that won't go away, based in a riding that's more divided about Emerson's decision than many news reports suggest.



Recall campaigns are underway, petitions drawn up and protests continuing as the 60-year-old millionaire remains defiant, saying he won't resign.



He has allies in Mayor Sam Sullivan, B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell, Darcy Rezac of the Vancouver Board of Trade and a host of business people.



Emerson's move is good for Vancouver, good for B.C., good for Canada, they say. Translation-it's just business, that's all, and critics should get over it.



But, as Claudepierre pointed out, Canadians enjoy a privilege called democracy. It's our right to cast a ballot for the person and political party we want to work on our behalf.



"It's the principle of it all," he said. "I feel betrayed. My son, who's 16 years old, would disown me if I pulled a trick like that with just one person, never mind 20,000 people."



Claudepierre was one of 20 constituents-10 men and 10 women-the Courier spoke to last Thursday and Friday in the Vancouver-Kingsway riding.



Interviews were conducted on cafe patios, in a veterans' club, on street corners, in a restaurant, at a seniors' care home, a community centre, a playground and at a rally organized by the NDP at Sir Alexander Mackenzie elementary school.



Eleven of the 20 people said Emerson should resign. Of those 11, five voted for Emerson, two for Waddell, two wouldn't say and another two didn't vote.



Four people-two Liberals, a nonvoter and a woman who wouldn't reveal her vote-didn't have a problem with Emerson's defection, saying he shouldn't resign.



Five others-a Liberal, NDPer, Green, a nonvoter and a man who wouldn't share his vote-were undecided whether he should resign.



Respondents ranged in age from 27-year-old Kat Featherstone to 86-year-old Arthur Swanson. The majority were working class and reflected a small sample of the culturally diverse riding.



Vancouver-Kingsway runs east from Oak Street to Boundary Road and north from 41st Avenue to 16th Avenue. Emerson's office, near Victoria Drive, is considered the heart of the riding.



It's also where the Courier began its quest to gauge voters' reaction to Emerson's defection. After speaking to Claudepierre, the Courier crossed Kingsway to visit the Army Navy Airforce club, unit 100.



A handful of grey-haired men sat in a quiet hall watching a big screen television featuring the Canada-Germany men's hockey game from the Olympics in Italy.



The score was 4-1 Canada when Ken Rabb, in between sips of beer, weighed in on the Emerson affair. The retired mechanic voted for Emerson, but didn't think he should resign.



"No matter if he's Liberal or Conservative, I'd rather see him in there," he said, keeping an eye on the hockey game. "I like that he wasn't involved in these different scandals [ad sponsorship, income trust]. If he would have been running for the Conservatives, I would have still voted for him."



On the television, Shane Doan pots another goal for Canada as the third period ends. Rabb and the rest of the men are happy with the win.



Politics is a topic only Rabb would tackle, with the other men preferring to drink beer and talk hockey. Outside, at a nearby gas station, the Courier got a similar reaction from Edward Scigliano as he pumped air into his mountain bike's back tire.



With some prodding, Scigliano, a 31-year-old cement finisher, admitted he didn't vote in the Jan. 23 election. Emerson's defection, he said, is a good reason why he chose not to cast a ballot.



"I just figured that anybody I voted for wouldn't make a difference. Either way you're screwed. Emerson is proof."



When Scigliano votes, it's for any party but the Conservatives or the Liberals. He considered the NDP and the Greens in the last election, but never made it to the polls.



"Honestly, I don't follow politics that much," he said, before jumping on his bike and riding away.



Vietnamese and other Asian businesses dominate this busy strip of Kingsway. Although some had "Recall David Emerson" signs posted in their windows, none would speak to the Courier.



That wasn't the case back at Emerson's office, where businessman Jay Shankar gave his name to a constituency assistant. He heard a petition was being circulated to support Emerson, and he wanted his name on it.



Shankar voted for Emerson in January and in the June 2004 election. So did five family members, he said, noting they, too, support Emerson's defection to the Conservatives.



"I voted for him as a person, not as a party," he said. "It doesn't matter what he did. He's an educated man, he knows what he's doing. Mr. Emerson did the right thing. He'll be representing the riding well as a minister."



Shankar glances at Claudepierre who is still carrying his "Why vote?" sign. He believes Claudepierre is wasting his time, pointing out no federal legislation exists to force Emerson to resign.



"So why do that?" he said, before getting into his car.



Across town in a booth at Duffin's Donuts at 33rd and Main, Verna Pounder was longing for the days of former prime minister John Diefenbaker and former B.C. premier W.A.C. Bennett.



"They were true, honest and reliable," said the retired switchboard operator. "You could take them for their word."



Pounder wouldn't say whether she voted for Emerson, but the more she talked, the more she gave clues of her choice. She's not an NDP member and said she supports Emerson "to the point that he's an intelligent man and will probably do a lot for the province."



Should he resign?



"What we should do is forget about it, let this one go. But in the next election, we should make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen again."



Pounder, however, is worried about the effect Emerson's defection will have on young voters. As political parties and youth organizations continue to encourage young people to vote, Emerson's move can't help their efforts, she said.



"Democracy kind of gets lost when politicians do things like that."



Pounder expected a lot of debate over Emerson's defection at a rally at Sir Alexander Mackenzie school later that night. She received a recorded message from federal NDP leader Jack Layton telling her about it.



A friend of hers, who is "anti-NDP," also received the message. Her friend likened it to "a harassment call." Pounder nor her friend planned to attend the rally.



Roughly 400 people did attend what was largely an NDP love-in, with the crowd giving standing ovations to Layton, who was joined by NDP MPs Libby Davies (Vancouver East) and Peter Julian (Burnaby-New Westminster).



Vancouver NDP MLAs David Chudnovsky and Adrian Dix were also jammed into the school's auditorium. The lobby had volunteers busily urging people to sign petitions and fill out Ottawa-bound postcards calling for Emerson's resignation.



In Layton's opening 15-minute speech, he dwelled on the importance of democracy and the right to vote, calling it a "precious act." He called Emerson's defection "the most blatant betrayal of a group of citizens and their democratically expressed will that we've ever seen in this country."



He also criticized Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Mayor Sullivan and Premier Campbell for supporting Emerson.



"People who think it's fine have lost touch with what democracy is all about."



Layton promised the NDP will present a bill in the first session of the House of Commons to prevent MPs from crossing the floor. He noted that 40 Conservative MPs supported an earlier bill under the Martin government, but some have since changed their mind.



Layton urged the crowd to continue to fight for Emerson's resignation, saying citizens' pressure can make a difference.



"This is not going to blow over," he said to a boisterous crowd, which broke into a chant of "recall, recall, recall."



But not everybody there was an NDP supporter.



Longtime Conservative Mike Watkins, who was once national committee chair of the Progressive Conservatives, and Kevin Chalmers, a senior volunteer in both Emerson campaigns, bravely addressed the crowd.



Watkins, a soccer coach, had just come from a practice and was dressed in shorts and wearing a whistle around his neck.



"I'm here to ask the rhetorical question, 'Why aren't there more Conservatives speaking out against this? Am I the only one here, or the only one foolish enough to get up in front of a crowd?'"



He then grabbed his whistle and blew two sharp beeps.



"Emerson, you're back to the showers for unsportsmanlike conduct."



It got a laugh, but what Watkins didn't tell the crowd was that he voted for Emerson last month. He also admitted to voting for the Greens in 2004. He had his own reasons for doing so.



"I wasn't so keen about Emerson running in this riding, but I voted for him specifically because I knew the Liberals would be in opposition. And if he actually stuck it out and sat in opposition, he'd be effective. That's the whole reason I voted for him."



Now Watkins thinks Emerson should resign, and so does Chalmers who is leading a campaign to "de-elect" Emerson. He told the Courier after the rally the campaign will be run like an election campaign, with lawn signs and door-to-door visits.



"Our colour schemes are black and white because the issue is black and white. I certainly don't hope to be doing this in six months, but if that's the case, so be it. Democracy is too important to let go. So we'll be out there in the rain, in the snow, in the sun until it's done."



Chalmers' effort alone, he said, proves the push to have Emerson resign is not solely being organized by the NDP-as Emerson alleged on a recent CKNW radio show, referring to his critics as "partisan zealots and party operatives that have been spinning the media."



"Whether it helps the NDP or not, this is an issue that transcends politics," Chalmers said. "It really is amazing in many senses that it has really shaken the electorate and many Canadians from their apathy."



The morning after the rally, the Courier received a phone call from Lionel Hodgson, a 76-year-old disabled man living in Three Links Care Centre at 22nd and Renfrew.



Hodgson voted for Emerson and wanted to ensure his name was included in the list of voters who support the MP's move to the Conservatives.



Like Jay Shankar and Ken Rabb, Hodgson said he voted for Emerson the man, not Emerson the Liberal. Hodgson was the first person to congratulate Emerson at his victory party at the Golden Swan restaurant on election night.



The Courier has photographs of Hodgson, who is in a wheelchair, greeting Emerson in the parking lot of the restaurant on Victoria Drive.



It's the same restaurant where Emerson told supporters he would be Harper's "worst nightmare" and be "in the faces" of Conservative cabinet ministers.



"There are a lot of people out there who are opposed to what he did, but those people don't represent everybody," said Hodgson in an interview in the care centre's lobby. "What Emerson did was his choice and he had no choice considering Martin's poor showing. He let down Emerson."



Added Hodgson, repeating the mantra of the business set: "It will be good for the city, good for the province and good for the people of Canada. Emerson loves Canada, so does Harper and so do I."



Hodgson has an interesting political history, with various political allegiances. He was a campaign manager for former parks board commissioner Charlie Stephens in the 1950s and a publicist for former Socred MLA Fred Sharp in 1960.



In the November municipal election, he voted for Vision Vancouver mayoral candidate Jim Green. In the provincial election, he voted for the Liberals and is a supporter of Premier Campbell.



He knows about good public relations, having worked as a publicist for the Arts Club Theatre for nine years. No matter what people think of Emerson's move, the public outcry is coming from a minority, he believes.



"They're taking it too personally."



After leaving Hodgson to a bridge game, the Courier travelled to a street corner at 18th and Cambie. Up and down Cambie, pictures of Emerson are plastered on light poles calling for his resignation. Some have "Judas" in bold letters written on them.



On her way home from shopping, Rosalind Scarnell plunked down her bags of groceries to talk about an issue that she believes is personal. She voted for Emerson and doesn't buy the argument that his defection is good for business.



"It's not just any job, and I personally don't think that he has the rights or the freedoms to make those decisions independent of the voters. If he was a civil servant, a deputy minister, offered a different job, that would be a different story. But he seems to have forgotten that he is the representative of the riding and he is beholden to the people of his riding."



Scarnell also doesn't agree that Ontario MP Belinda Stronach, a former Conservative leadership hopeful, did the same thing when she crossed the floor in May 2005 to the Liberals.



"Emerson did not cross the floor on principle, he did not cross the floor because of a disagreement on principle, he did not cross the floor because the people in his riding asked him to. He crossed the floor for a job opportunity."



Added Scarnell: "One would have thought from David Emerson's past that he would be a trustworthy candidate. So I think we're all shocked and surprised. There was no reason not to trust him. I think it's totally outrageous."



So how does all of this sit with Emerson?



Over the weekend, he admitted on a national television talk show that he wasn't "the sharpest political knife in the drawer."



He also promised to write letters of apology to those constituents upset by his move to the Conservatives. There is no plan, however, for a town hall meeting.



Since he defected Feb. 6, the former head of forestry giant Canfor has carefully chosen the media organizations he talks to. CKNW, CTV, The Vancouver Sun and The Globe and Mail have all had their time with Emerson.



Last Wednesday, the Courier learned through Emerson's public relations person in Ottawa that it was 70th on the list of media organizations requesting an interview.



It didn't matter that the Courier left messages with Emerson's constituency office on the day of Emerson's defection, or contacted former Conservative MP John Reynolds, who recruited Emerson.



It also didn't matter that the Courier is the paper delivered to more homes in Vancouver-Kingsway than any other news publication.



After the Courier finished interviews with constituents Friday afternoon, and still hadn't received a call from Emerson, it was time for a visit to Emerson's house.



The 60-year-old millionaire lives in a new heritage-style home on a leafy street in Shaughnessy, which is not in the Vancouver-Kingsway riding.



Accompanied by a photographer, this reporter climbed the steps to the front door and rang the doorbell. Emerson's wife Theresa could be seen through the large windows adjacent to the door.



She approached with a puzzled look on her face. As this reporter was about to press his business card against the window, she noticed the photographer.



She said something indecipherable, turned and disappeared up a set of stairs. Maybe she was going to get Emerson, we thought. So we waited.



He didn't show. I shoved a business card through a mail slot that read, "Mr. Emerson, I would like to speak to you. Please call me."



As of yesterday morning, the man who was once a Liberal and elected by 20,062 voters to work on their behalf, still hadn't called.



Nor had he resigned.



published on 02/22/2006



----------------------------------------



I will say it again, floor-crossing is not acceptable in Canada.

Toronto Sun with Angry Anti-Tory Editorial Comment

Toronto Sun criticizes Stephen Harper PM of Canada:



Editorial: Doing what is right



Throughout the Sun's history, we've been the first to speak up whenever we see the liberal -- and Liberal -- media unfairly trashing Conservatives and conservatism.



That said, here's a news flash for Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives.



All this heat they're getting over David Emerson? It's not a liberal media conspiracy. If it was, we wouldn't be part of it.



This isn't about being Liberal or Conservative, or liberal or conservative. This is about right and wrong.



And it's wrong for Harper to have told voters in the election that it was time to throw the bums out, and then, at the first opportunity, to act like the bums.



Harper's enticement of Emerson to the Conservatives might have been the "one day wonder" he hoped for if he and his MPs hadn't spent months bashing Belinda Stronach and Paul Martin for doing the same thing in reverse.



Trying to argue, as Harper and many of his now tongue-tied ministers and backbenchers have, that the two cases are different, doesn't pass the smell test.



The details may be different. The substance is the same.



As former Sun business editor and cabinet minister Garth Turner, now the newly-elected Conservative MP for Halton, wrote in his blog last week: "I campaigned to advance issues my middle class voters are so concerned with -- things those families need and want.



"But, I arrived as the prime minister was appointing a floor-crossing Liberal and an unelected party official to his cabinet, which seemed to fly in the face of everything I had told voters about accountability and democracy ...



"The election was about change. I asked people in Halton to embrace the Conservatives as a modern, inclusive, mainstream, principled party of honest people committed to changing the system for the better. Finally ... Something to believe in ...



"Sure, I thought the appointment of those two ministers was questionable.



And after stating many a time that Belinda Stronach should have sought a byelection after her defection, how could I not say the same obvious thing now? It was simple for my constitutents to understand, and simple for me ..."



Exactly. Trust us, from past experience we know that Turner can be controversial, a glory hog and a pain in the butt. But he also knows what people are thinking and in this case he's 100% right.



Three weeks ago in this space, we urged you, our readers, to vote Conservative and end 13 years of corrupt Liberal rule. Like so many of you, we care about the future of Conservatism and conservatism. There is so much work for this new government to do -- cutting the GST, helping parents with the cost of child care, fixing our justice system, healing health care, uniting the country.



Harper and Emerson need to have a long talk. Emerson should either agree to run in a byelection in Vancouver-Kingsway as a Conservative, or he should resign. This controversy has already taken up too much time and cost this new government too much political capital.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------



The honeymoon is over Stephen Harper



Liberal Party of Canada Leadership

Here is an article from The Globe and Mail's Jeffery Simpson:





Liberal leadership lineup starts in Toronto



From Saturday's Globe and Mail



Friday, February 10, 2006



Toronto — The Liberal leadership race has not formally begun, what with big-name candidates declining to run, yet two trends are already making it unique in the party's history.



Nine of the possible candidates are from the Toronto area, reflecting how Toronto has become the party's power base.



Also, for the first time, the Liberal race will not be among parliamentary frontbenchers.





------------- End of snippet



You have to be an insider to read the rest

At the heat goes on in the New CONservative Party

Emerson Called Traitor by constituents say Globe and Mail. Article below:





Emerson called a traitor by constituents



Canadian Press



Vancouver — Hundreds of people angry at David Emerson's defection from the Liberals to Conservatives chanted "traitor" at a protest rally.



They packed a high school auditorium Saturday in the Vancouver-Kingsway riding to vent their anger and frustration, saying their votes in the Jan. 23 federal election had been rendered meaningless after Mr. Emerson crossed the floor to accept a position in the Conservative cabinet two weeks later.



Kerry Galloway, who admitted to not voting regularly, said after much consideration and lots of research, he decided to vote Liberal.



"Then, a couple of weeks later, I found out that my vote was switched, that I had been disenfranchised, that my vote had been converted for a vote for a set of policies which are the diametric opposite than I selected by putting that X in that box " he said to cheers.



Alice Edge said the situation has made her ashamed as a mother. She told of badgering her sons to vote only to result in what she said is an undemocratic outcome.



"When my two young sons came home and they said to me: 'What is going on?' I got to tell you that my credibility as a mother has just been set back many, many years," she said.



"I want a by-election and I want it tomorrow," Mr. Edge said.



One man who spoke in defence of Mr. Emerson, who is now the international trade minister, was drowned out in a chorus of angry boos at the event, organized by the New Democratic Party.



But, the ongoing furor does not seem to have swayed Mr. Emerson.



In an interview with the CBC on Friday, he said: "No, I'm not going to quit."



"We've got at least three, perhaps more, members of Parliament who have crossed the floor or opted to sit as an independent," he said. "Frankly, my circumstances are not any different than those. As, and when, Parliament changes the rules to apply to all members of Parliament, I will abide by those rules."



Vancouver-East New Democrat MP Libby Davies said Mr. Emerson's arrogance has enraged his constituents.



"I don't think Mr. Emerson has heard anything yet in terms of the way people feel," she said.



The NDP has formally asked the federal ethics commissioner to investigate Mr. Emerson's defection.



New Democrat MP Peter Julian said Prime Minister Stephen Harper could be in violation of Parliament's conflict of interest guidelines, which prohibit members from acting to advance their own or other MP's private interests.



Mr. Julian has the support of fellow New Democrat Ian Waddell, who finished second to Mr. Emerson in his effort to make a political comeback.



Mr. Waddell has said of those who cast ballots in the riding, 80 per cent voted against the Conservative Party.



Mr. Emerson received 43.5 per cent of the vote as a Liberal while Tory Kanman Wong got 18.8 per cent. Mr. Waddell garnered 33.5 per cent of the vote.



Mr. Waddell served as New Democrat MP for Vancouver-Kingsway three times between 1979 and 1988 and as the member for Port Moody-Coquitlam from 1988 to 1993.



The fracas has also revealed rifts in Conservative caucus.



Ontario MP Garth Turner hopes to push ahead with legislation that would deter future David Emersons and Belinda Stronachs from switching political parties but admits he has probably limited his future in the Conservative Party.



---------- End of Article.



Looks likes the CONservative Party Grass Roots disapprove.



Garth Turner (early in this blog) is not happy.



From The Globe and Mail :





Turner says he'll move bill to stop MPs jumping parties



GLORIA GALLOWAY



From Saturday's Globe and Mail



Ottawa — Despite a tongue-lashing from the Prime Minister, Conservative Garth Turner says he will proceed with a private-member's bill that would force MPs such as Trade Minister David Emerson to resign and run again when they switch parties.



Mr. Emerson, who has been the subject of intense public criticism since being appointed to the Conservative cabinet on Monday — two weeks after being elected as a Liberal — was unavailable for comment yesterday even though the calls for his resignation continued.



Mr. Turner, the MP for Halton, Ont., said he was castigated by Mr. Harper for telling reporters on Thursday that Mr. Emerson should resign his seat and run again. But the financial-management-expert-turned-politician was unrepentant yesterday.



“I cannot stand and support something in Ottawa that I would not in a town-hall meeting in north Oakville,” he wrote on his web log. “Not even when it is the PM asking — or demanding.”



And, despite the censure from above, he said he will put forward a private-member's bill to force politicians who change political allegiances to resign their seat and ask their constituents for a new mandate.



“I do believe that voters are jaded today,” Mr. Turner said, “And one of the reasons that they are jaded and they feel they don't matter is that people get to be part of the government who never ran to be in that government.”



That's also true of Conservative campaign co-chair Michael Fortier, the new Public Works Minister who will be sworn in as a Senator because he did not run for a seat in the House of Commons, Mr. Turner said.



In his blog, he said he expected to be assigned an office in renovated washroom “somewhere in a forgotten corner of a vermin-infested dank basement” and a seat in the Commons that will be visible only during lunar eclipses.



It has been a bad first week for the Conservative government that came to power on a promise of accountability and was quickly lambasted from all parts of the country for moves that suggest the opposite. They include Mr. Emerson and Mr. Fortier's appointments to Cabinet and the appointment of former defence lobbyist Gordon O'Connor as Defence Minister.



Asked if he were feeling uncomfortable in his own party, Mr. Turner replied: “I can't answer that to the extent that my party is feeling uncomfortable with me. I regret that because, to me, it is a basic role of a Member of Parliament to voice concerns and opinions and convictions.”



Last night, Mr. Harper said his government will move quickly to implement its campaign promises, chiefly lowering the GST and “cleaning up our own government” with accountability legislation.



In his first speech as Prime Minister, he also said the government will toughen the criminal justice system and give child-care subsidies to parents. Mr. Harper was speaking at a tribute in Halifax to outgoing Nova Scotia Premier John Hamm, in which he praised the departing leader, saying that if all politicians had his integrity, no accountability legislation would be needed.NDP MP Peter Stoffer, who represents the Nova Scotia riding of Sackville-Eastern Shore, proposed a private-member's bill during the previous session of Parliament that would have forced political floor-crossers to quit and run again. He plans to re-enter it when the House returns and said he is glad to hear of Mr. Turner's plans for a similar bill. “He is more than welcome to second my bill and I would be honoured to second his,” Stoffer said



Foreign Affairs Minister Peter MacKay defended Mr. Emerson yesterday saying he was obviously disillusioned with the Liberals and that makes his situation different to that of people such as Belinda Stronach who defected from the Conservatives to take a seat in cabinet at a time when the Liberal government needed her vote to stay alive.



“What David Emerson did, I would suggest, is different, in the sense that he has done this early after the election in hopes of continuing the important work that he was doing inside a government which he was obviously very disillusioned with,” Mr. MacKay told CBC Newsworld. “Unlike other moves, it didn't happen at a critical juncture that propped the government up. There wasn't that sense that there was strict reward or leadership ambition.”



But that view is not shared by Peter Julian of the NDP or Wayne Easter of the Liberals who have separately asked Ethics Commissioner Bernard Shapiro to investigate whether Mr. Emerson violated the MPs' code of ethics by switching parties.



Both MPs point to the ruling Mr. Shapiro made in the case of Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh who was accused by Conservative MP Gurmant Grewal of offering him benefits as an inducement to become a Liberal. Mr. Shapiro said any attempt to further Mr. Grewal's private interests would have been “an extremely serious” breach of the code.



With a report from Jane Armstrong



------------- end of article.



I am certain the CONservative Party is suffering from meltdown, and not a light dose of it.



Canada's New Conservatives - Same old Mulroney Tories

Ancient National Revenue Minister Under Kim Campbell, Garth Turner now says:



Choices





posted by Garth Turner on 02.09.06 @ 11:26 pm | 308 Comments



First, I’d like to thank all the people who took a moment to drop me a line over the past few hours, and those who have come by and left a comment here. Mostly I’d like to thank the five volunteers who showed up tonight in Milton to help Sharon and Esther unpack all the stuff that arrived from the outgoing Halton MP’s office. Boy, having more than one second-hand computer and a geriatric printer is going to be sweet.



Speaking of offices, after today I’m expecting the Whip will be assigning me a renovated washroom somewhere in a forgotten corner of a vermin-infested dank basement in Ottawa. That should go well with my seat in the House of Commons that will be visible only during lunar eclipses.



Uh-huh. That kind of a day. This one MP came face-to-face with the party machine in a series of unhappy meetings including one tonight with the prime minister. I think it is now safe to say my career options within the Conservative caucus are seriously limited. If you would like a course on how not to be popular in Ottawa, then take a seat.



I have written here many times over the past few months about my journey to become an MP again, and why I wanted to return to Ottawa. It was not to be a minister with a limo, but, as I explained, to try and empower elected people more, to make them relevant and free, so the voters would also become more empowered. And I campaigned to advance issues my middle class voters are so concerned with – things those families need and want.



But, I arrived as the prime minister was appointing a floor-crossing Liberal and an unelected party official to his cabinet, which seemed to fly in the face of everything I had told voters about accountability and democracy. It also made me question the whole process, after eight months of knocking on doors to win my coveted seat in this magnificent stone building on the banks of the Rideau.



Going from door to door turns a politician into a democrat. At least, it did for me. By the time I got to Parliament Hill, I was infused with the spirit of a new era in government, sated on the belief we would see freedom reign in the Chamber and that the days of subjugation of MPs by the prime minster’s office were numbered. I had swallowed with gusto promises of more free votes, more powerful committees of free-thinking MPs, more listening to the voters, and an elected and responsible Senate.



And, most importantly, I had taken that to the people. Change. The election was about change. I asked people in Halton to embrace the Conservatives as a modern, inclusive, mainstream, principled party of honest people committed to changing the system for the better. Finally. Something worth knocking on doors for in the dark and the cold. Something to believe in. Something to run for. Something on the Hill worth coming back for with a passion.



Sure, I thought the appointment of those two ministers was questionable. And after stating many a time that Belinda Stronach should have sought a by-election after her defection, how could I not say the same obvious thing now? It was simple for my constitutents to understand, and simple for me. I did not seek the microphones out, but when they were under my nose and a clear question was asked, I gave a clear answer.



Everybody who makes up the government should be elected. They should be elected as members of the party that forms the government. Anybody who switches parties should go back to the people. To do otherwise is to place politicians above the people when, actually, it’s the other way around.



But my comments were deemed not helpful, even though I chose them carefully and pulled some punches, suggesting Minister Emerson be given a little time before deciding on whether or not to get elected as a Tory.



Did I know the potential consequences of speaking my mind, or sticking with the principles that brought me to this cold hill? Yeah, I did. I have been an MP before, and a leadership candidate and a cabinet minister. I have the hide to prove it. I know the PMO has a song sheet it wants all caucus members to sing from, and I know what happens when an individual chooses to go his or her own way. I was just hoping this time I would not be asked to choose – between party and principle.



I chose principle. My deepest loyalty is to what I believe, what I told the voters and what I want Parliament to become. The Emerson affair may indeed blow over. The minister may decide not to take the heat. David may turn into a cabinet star and a national asset. But he should still have the conviction to get elected a member of the team he chose. The same team that I chose, and fought like a warrior to join, helped by hundreds more and supported by tens of thousands of others. How could any member of caucus not privately feel the same?



A few nights ago, I made some pledges here. I pledged to remember that my job is not to serve the party or the prime minister, but rather the people who sent me here. I pledged to work to enhance the position of MP, because when that happens, the voters win. I pledged to share my MP’s power with you every way I could, and to speak up for middle class Canadians.



That voice may be a little fainter now, coming from that forgotten basement washroom office, but, dammit, it won’t quit.





----------------------



I invite any Canadian Conservatives to come over to the Liberals and create and honest and accountable government

And the anger keeps mounting

Graham Thomson of the Journal put it well!!



Here is his comment from Graham Thomson's Blog:



SUBJECT: Outrage, what outrage? Perhaps I’m just getting too cynical...but I’m finding it difficult to muster much outrage at Stephen Harper’s cabinet appointments this week.

Yes, I was as surprised as anyone over David Emerson’s hypocritical jump to the Conservatives — especially since he was presented as a Liberal poster boy during the election campaign in British Columbia.

And I had to stifle a guffaw when Harper appointed Michael Fortier to the Senate to sit as a non-elected member of cabinet. That one move managed to make a mockery of Senate reform and responsible government.

People are rightly angered at the hypocrisy of it all (Liberal supporters in Vancouver-Kingsway must be ready to toss Emerson into Coal Harbor).

So, where’s my outrage?

I’m not sure. Perhaps I’ve misplaced it after 25 years as a journalist. Or maybe it’s been worn to the nub after reporting on this kind of thing so many times in the past.

Remember Reform Leader Preston Manning in 1993?

He promised a new era of cleaner more responsible politics — Reformers wouldn’t accept the gold-plated MPs pension plan. They wouldn’t fly business class. Manning said Reformers would never settle into Stornoway and he actually held a photo-op to hand back the keys to his limo.

Manning and Reformers such as Deb Grey broke every one of those promises.

The Liberals, of course, are masters at political sleight-of-hand.

Jean Chretien famously promised to scrap the GST — and infamously never did.

There are all kinds of other examples, too numerous and ponderous to mention here, of politicians putting expediency before principle.

I suppose there is a silver lining here: For all those afraid Harper has a hidden agenda to do things radically different, he has shown he’s just like all the rest.

In a bizarre way, that reaffirms my faith in politicians. As long as they’re willing to do what it takes to stay in power at the federal level, they’ll never do anything radical.

Maybe that’s why I can’t muster any outrage.

Or perhaps it's because I have high expectations for members of Harper's cabinet such as Rona Ambrose and Tony Clement.

Hmm, maybe I'm not as cynical as I like to think.

COMMENTS

Posted by Graham Thomson on 2/7/2006 12:14:43 PM



I expect the Conservation popularity to hit below 20% soon!

The people are mad!!

Since Stephen Harper took the oath to be PM, the Canadian Public are critical of his choices for cabinet..



1 Manitoba rep has a criminal record.



2 Ontario reps are under question for their histories.



The Vancouver minister who crossed the floor is risng consternation.



The Montreal Senator in Cabinet is not accountable to the Commons.



We have a major downward spin on the CONservatives all right!

Conservative Cabinet revealed

Torontoian Stephen Harper - Alberta MP Calgary West Prime Minister

Nicholson, Rob (Hon.) Ont MP Niagara Falls - Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform

Emerson, David (Hon.) Elected Liberal BC MP Vancouver Kingsway now joins the CONservative - Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the Vancouver-Whistler Olympics

Blackburn, Jean-Pierre (Hon.) - Quebec MP Jonquière—Alma , former MP is the Brian Mulroney caucas, Minister of Labour and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec

Thompson, Greg (Hon.) - NB MP New Brunswick Southwest Minister of Veterans Affairs

Marjory LeBreton (Hon.), appointed by Brian Mulroney, Leader of the Government in the Senate

Solberg, Monte (Hon.) Alberta MP Medicine Hat Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Strahl, Chuck (Hon.) BC MP Chilliwack—Fraser Canyon Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board

Lunn, Gary (Hon.) BC MP Saanich—Gulf Islands Minister of Natural Resources

MacKay, Peter (Hon.) NS MP CEntral Nova Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Hearn, Loyola (Hon.) NLFD MP St. John's South—Mount Pearl - Minister of Fisheries and Oceans

Day, Stockwell (Hon.) BC MP Okanagan—Coquihalla Formaer Alberta deputy premier and former Alberta Treasurer and for CCRA leader (Stephen Harper replaced this person at the helm of the CCRA) Minister of Public Safety

Skelton, Carol (Hon.) Sask MP Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar first Sask Female MP in the Cabinet Minister of National Revenue and Minister of Western Economic Diversification

Toews, Vic (Hon.) Man MP Provencher Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Ambrose, Rona (Hon.) AB MP Edmonton - Spruce Grove - Minister of the Environment

Chong, Michael (Hon.) ONT MP Wellington—Halton Hills - President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister for Sport

Finley, Diane (Hon.) Ont MP Haldimand—Norfolk Minister of Human Resources and Social Development

O'Connor, Gordon (Hon.) Ont MP Carleton—Mississippi Mills Minister of National Defence

Oda, Bev (Hon.) Ont MP Durham Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women

Prentice, Jim (Hon.) AB MP Calgary Noth-Center Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians

Baird, John (Hon.) Ont MP Ottawa West—Nepean President of the Treasury Board

Bernier, Maxime (Hon.) QC MP Beauce Minister of Industry

Cannon, Lawrence (Hon.) QC MP Pontiac Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities

Clement, Tony (Hon.) ONT MP Parry Sound - Muskoka (isn't his seat under a recount?) Minister of Health and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario

Flaherty, Jim (Hon.) ONT MP Whitby—Oshawa (same guy who still owes the Ontario PCs over $50000) Minister of Finance

Verner, Josée (Hon.) QC MP Louis-Saint-Laurent Minister of International Cooperation and Minister for la Francophonie and Official Languages

Michael Fortier (Hon.) Montreal Senator (Wait appointed senator?) Minister of Public Works and Government Services



My reaction is HYPOCRACY!! You have a floor crosser and an unelected senator that PM Harper some years ago denouned. Added he denounced Floor Crossing. So far so bad.



And now 3 April the Commons will meet? Talk about delying the inevitable.

Conservatives and Liberals ready to go head to head

PM Stephen Harper to take up office 6 Feb 2006. Canada has a hung parliament and it may not be easy for the new CONservative to lead. IF the budget is a deficit budget, Canada will go tothe poll over that issue!!



Liberal Leadership : The rules are not laid out yet 4 people are not seeking the leadership 'officially' . John Manley (YAY!!), Brian Tobin (YAY!!), Frank McKenna and Allan Rock have said no but what is preventing them from having a change of heart ( For Canada's sake, Manley and Tobin better stay clearly out!) .



About those predicitons:



Nfld Avalon L -> C



PEI all 4 seats went Liberal



NS stayed the same



NB Tobique-Mactaquac L -> C and a possible recount



Quebec



Montreal Ahuntsic L -> BQ

Beauce L -> C

Beauport - Limoilou BQ -> C

Brome-Missisquoi L -> BQ

Brossard - La Prairie L->BQ

Quebec City Charlesbourg-Haute Sainte Charles BQ -> C

Gatineau L -> BQ (VERY BAD!!)

Montreal Jeanne Le Ber L -> BQ

Lotbiniere-Chutes-de-la-Chaudiere BQ -> C

Quebec City Louis-Hebert BQ -> C

Quebec City Louis-Saint-Laurent BQ -> C

Megantic-L'Erable BQ->C

Montreal Papineau L->BQ

Pontiac L -> C

Portneuf-Jacques-Cartier BQ -> I





Ontario



Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Barrie L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Burlington L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Chatham-Kent-Essex L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Glengarry-Prescott-Russell L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Halton L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Hamilton East - Stoney Creek L->NDP

Kitchener-Conestoga L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Lambton-Kent-Middlesex L -> C (Hargrove was right)

London-Fanshawe L -> NDP

Northumberland - Quinte West L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Ottawa-Orleans L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Ottawa West - Nepean L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Parkdale - High Park L -> NDP

Parry Sound - Muskoka L -> C (Hargrove was right) but under automatic recount

Peterborough L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Saint Catharines L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Sarnia - Lambton L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Simcoe North L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Trinity-Spadina L -> NDP

Whitby-Oshawa L -> C (Hargrove was right)

Oshawa C -> C (Hargrove was right)



Manitoba



Churchill NDP(I)->L

Winnipeg South L -> C (Hargrove was right) and this should be a recount



Saskatchewan



Desnethe-Missinippi-Churchill River C -> L and a maybe recount



Alberta



Edmonton Centre L -> C

Edmonton Millwoods Beaumount L (I) -> C



British Columbia



BC Southern Interior C -> NDP

Newton North Delta C -> L

New Westminister - Coquitlam C-> NDP

Surrey North (C) I -> NDP

Vancouver Island North C -> NDP

Victoria L -> NDP

West Vancouver - Sunshine Coast - Sea to Sky Country C -> L



Western Arctic aka Northwest Territories L -> NDP